
Sign up here to enjoy the
full benefits of this site.
Click here to log in.
Forgot your username
or password?
|
||
![]() Sign up here to enjoy the full benefits of this site. Click here to log in. Forgot your username or password? Reach out to Oregon progressives--
advertise on this site. Please note: Ads in this area for candidates, ballot measures, products, etc. are not representative of an endorsement by Democracy for Oregon or DFO Action.
Vote today... |
A cabinet-level poverty czar?
Submitted by Jenni on April 4, 2008 - 7:31am
As many of you may know, today is the 40th anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. At the time, he was about to begin a campaign on economic fairness to get rid of poverty in this country. I was sitting at my desk working and watching an interview with two of his four children - Martin Luther King III and the Rev. Bernice King. His son discussed the topic:
On Wednesday, King III had an op-ed piece in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on the issue of a cabinet-level poverty czar. He called on all three of the presidential candidates to create such a position within their first 100 days in office. He wrote:
You can read the entire piece here. I think this is a great idea. The biggest reason why I originally supported John Edwards for president was his ideas and stances regarding poverty. I think poverty is a huge issue in our country that has been overlooked for too long.
|
|
War on Poverty Czar
Why would we need a Czar (Russian for Emperor) for a poverty program that has failed. In the 40 year existence of Johnson's program, it has failed to meet the outcomes established for the program. The program doesn't work, it is time to rethink the program and come up with something else.
A new program...
No one ever said we had to use Johnson's program. The whole point of a cabinet-level position is to come up with new ideas, solutions, etc. that will help us to get people and families out of poverty. And by having someone in the president's cabinet whose job it is to focus on poverty, we know someone will be working on the issue full-time.